Monolink — Monolink (live) @ Fusion 2018

    Melodic Techno · 1h 22m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    90/100
    Level
    reference level
    Duration
    1h 22m
    Genre
    Melodic Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Monolink.

    In short

    Monolink (live) @ Fusion 2018 by Monolink scores 90/100 in the SOONOS analysis (reference level). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (87/100).

    The DJ doesn't just play tracks; they use the electronic pulse as a canvas for a live instrumental performance that creates a unique, unrepeatable moment.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (32:00, 47:00, 52:00, 62:30, 67:00, 70:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Leverage the live guitar elements even more during rhythmic peaks to further distinguish the sound.
    • Experiment with subtle polyrhythms in the percussion to add another layer of depth to the groove.
    • Maintain the patient intro style; it creates a powerful contrast when the beat finally drops.
    • Continue exploring the interplay between live vocals and synth automation.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 04:45

      Seamless transition from atmospheric intro to driving groove.

    • 10:15Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 10:15

      Smooth integration of new vocal elements over the existing groove.

    • 23:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:30

      Seamless integration of the incoming bassline while maintaining melodic clarity.

    • 29:00Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 29:00

      Artistic use of vocal delays to bridge two tracks; minor mid-range build-up.

    About this melodic techno set

    Monolink (live) @ Fusion 2018 is a melodic techno DJ set by Monolink, running 1h 22m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 90/100 overall — reference level.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ doesn't just play tracks; they use the electronic pulse as a canvas for a live instrumental performance that creates a unique, unrepeatable moment.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 87/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 621.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ doesn't just play tracks; they use the electronic pulse as a canvas for a live instrumental performance that creates a unique, unrepeatable moment.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%88
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured89
    Phrase Accuracymeasured94
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%94
    Narrative ArcAI96
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI92
    Section AwarenessAI95
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI90

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%90
    Energy Curvemeasured96
    PacingAI95
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI92
    Energy HandoffAI91
    Fatigue ControlAI54

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%87
    Unexpected MomentsAI88
    ContrastAI89
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI91
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI88

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI98

    Energy arc

    00:0081:30

    Transitions analysed (6)

    04:45

    Long melodic blend with phrase-perfect low-end swap

    Seamless transition from atmospheric intro to driving groove.

    95
    10:15

    Vocal layering and EQ carving

    Smooth integration of new vocal elements over the existing groove.

    92
    14:45

    Perfect Organic Blend

    100
    20:40

    Harmonic Handoff

    100
    23:30

    Long melodic blend with high-pass filtering

    Seamless integration of the incoming bassline while maintaining melodic clarity.

    92
    29:00

    Vocal loop layering and EQ swap

    Artistic use of vocal delays to bridge two tracks; minor mid-range build-up.

    85

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    95

    Musical coherence

    97

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    135 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,875

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    33

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    199

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    316

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (32:00, 47:00, 52:00, 62:30, 67:00, 70:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 04:45The Drop
    • 09:30Vocal Peak
    • 27:15Vocal Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Leverage the live guitar elements even more during rhythmic peaks to further distinguish the sound.
    • Experiment with subtle polyrhythms in the percussion to add another layer of depth to the groove.
    • Maintain the patient intro style; it creates a powerful contrast when the beat finally drops.
    • Continue exploring the interplay between live vocals and synth automation.
    • Experiment with more dramatic silence in breakdowns to enhance the drop impact.
    • Maintain the current balance of organic and electronic sounds.
    • Continue refining the live vocal processing to ensure absolute clarity in large festival environments.
    • Experiment with more dramatic silence or 'stop-start' moments to leverage the live guitar's impact.
    • Maintain the current balance of rhythmic drive and melodic vulnerability; it is your signature.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Monolink's Monolink (live) @ Fusion 2018 get?
    Monolink (live) @ Fusion 2018 scores 90/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (reference level), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Monolink (live) @ Fusion 2018?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 22m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 87/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Monolink sets analysed

    Similar melodic techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Monolink analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.