Mochakk — Mochakk Live @ Lowgame - Rio De Janeiro

    House · 1h 27m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    83/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 27m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mochakk.

    In short

    Mochakk Live @ Lowgame - Rio De Janeiro by Mochakk scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:00, 38:05, 43:00, 51:00, 54:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns.
    • Incorporate subtle melodic elements to enhance the emotional arc.
    • Maintain the high level of percussive layering as it is a clear strength.
    • Introduce more melodic variation to provide contrast to the driving percussion.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 1:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 1:45

      Expertly weaving the MJ vocal into a heavy tech-house groove, creating an instant peak moment.

    • 6:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 6:12

      A very smooth transition where the high-end percussion of the new track replaces the old one seamlessly.

    • 9:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 9:45

      A slightly abrupt energy shift, though the beatmatch is solid. It feels like a deliberate reset.

    • 12:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:45

      Flawless integration of the incoming track's hats over the outgoing groove.

    • 16:10Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 16:10

      Smooth transition that maintains the energy without any audible dip.

    • 20:30Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 20:30

      Expertly executed build-up that releases perfectly into the next track.

    • 24:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 24:12

      Excellent phrasing and level matching. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 28:45Measured (DSP)86/100Listen at 28:45

      The vocal is introduced at the perfect moment to elevate the energy for the next chapter.

    About this house set

    Mochakk Live @ Lowgame - Rio De Janeiro is a house DJ set by Mochakk, running 1h 27m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 46 points, moving between 75 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 566.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 18 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%80
    Beat Alignmentmeasured84
    Transition Qualitymeasured57
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured88
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured93
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured71

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%88
    Narrative ArcAI89
    ProgressionAI86
    Tension & ReleaseAI85
    Section AwarenessAI87
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI87
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI87
    Energy HandoffAI90
    Fatigue ControlAI49

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI86
    FreshnessAI48
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI91
    Identity ConsistencyAI95
    IntentionalityAI91
    ConfidenceAI93
    RestraintAI81
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    0:0086:00

    Transitions analysed (8)

    1:45

    Long percussive blend with vocal tease

    Expertly weaving the MJ vocal into a heavy tech-house groove, creating an instant peak moment.

    95
    6:12

    EQ-balanced percussive swap

    A very smooth transition where the high-end percussion of the new track replaces the old one seamlessly.

    92
    9:45

    Quick cut on the downbeat

    A slightly abrupt energy shift, though the beatmatch is solid. It feels like a deliberate reset.

    85
    12:45

    Long EQ blend with percussive layering

    Flawless integration of the incoming track's hats over the outgoing groove.

    92
    16:10

    Bass swap on the phrase

    Smooth transition that maintains the energy without any audible dip.

    88
    20:30

    High-pass filter sweep into a drop

    Expertly executed build-up that releases perfectly into the next track.

    90
    24:12

    Long percussive blend with smooth EQ handover

    Excellent phrasing and level matching. The transition is almost imperceptible.

    88
    28:45

    Vocal layering over a driving beat

    The vocal is introduced at the perfect moment to elevate the energy for the next chapter.

    86

    Technical subscores

    88

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    93

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    85

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    18 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    221 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,189

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    189

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    58

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    497

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (17:00, 38:05, 43:00, 51:00, 54:00, 58:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05The MJ Hook
    • 7:30Percussive Peak
    • 9:45Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 12:45Seamless Groove Integration
    • 20:30Peak Energy Drop
    • 26:30Groove Lock
    • 30:15Energy Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns.
    • Incorporate subtle melodic elements to enhance the emotional arc.
    • Maintain the high level of percussive layering as it is a clear strength.
    • Introduce more melodic variation to provide contrast to the driving percussion.
    • Experiment with longer, more atmospheric breakdowns to build even greater tension.
    • Monitor mid-range frequency density during complex layering moments.
    • Introduce more melodic elements to create a more diverse narrative arc.
    • Experiment with longer breakdowns to build more anticipation for the drops.
    • Use creative FX like delays or filters during transitions to add a personal signature.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Mochakk's Mochakk Live @ Lowgame - Rio De Janeiro get?
    Mochakk Live @ Lowgame - Rio De Janeiro scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Mochakk Live @ Lowgame - Rio De Janeiro?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 27m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Mochakk sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Mochakk analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…