MK — MK Underground Live Stream Set - Factory93
House · 1h 22m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, MK.
In short
MK Underground Live Stream Set - Factory93 by MK scores 79/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (75/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (30:00, 61:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Maintain the current level of EQ precision; it's your strongest technical asset.
- Try extending the 'tension' phases by using more aggressive filtering on the master bus.
- Look for tracks with slightly more 'organic' percussion to add warmth to the digital precision.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's hats are introduced early, followed by a seamless bass swap on the phrase.
Uses a high-pass filter on the outgoing track to make room for the new bassline. Very effective for maintaining momentum.
Seamless integration of the new bassline, perfectly phrase-aligned.
Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track.
Solid technical execution, though the vibe shift is very minimal, bordering on safe.
Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove seamlessly.
Smooth transition focusing on the vocal stabs and mid-range percussion.
About this house set
MK Underground Live Stream Set - Factory93 is a house DJ set by MK, running 1h 22m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 79/100 overall — club ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 75/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 26 points, moving between 65 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
7 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 205.9 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 13 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%90
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%84
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%79
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%75
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%88
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (7)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
A textbook tech-house transition. The incoming track's hats are introduced early, followed by a seamless bass swap on the phrase.
Filter-assisted blend
Uses a high-pass filter on the outgoing track to make room for the new bassline. Very effective for maintaining momentum.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Seamless integration of the new bassline, perfectly phrase-aligned.
Filter sweep and percussive layering
Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the incoming track.
EQ-based blend over 16 bars
Solid technical execution, though the vibe shift is very minimal, bordering on safe.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove seamlessly.
Mid-frequency focused blend
Smooth transition focusing on the vocal stabs and mid-range percussion.
Technical subscores
88
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
85
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
87
Loudness control
87
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
89
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
13 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
93 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
4,913
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
40
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
44
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
299
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (2×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (30:00, 61:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 4:30Groove Lock Entry
- 8:45Vocal Integration Peak
- 15:30Groove Lock
- 19:45Energy Plateau
- 26:15Groove Lock Peak
Coaching notes
- Maintain the current level of EQ precision; it's your strongest technical asset.
- Try extending the 'tension' phases by using more aggressive filtering on the master bus.
- Look for tracks with slightly more 'organic' percussion to add warmth to the digital precision.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does MK's MK Underground Live Stream Set - Factory93 get?
- MK Underground Live Stream Set - Factory93 scores 79/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is MK Underground Live Stream Set - Factory93?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 22m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 75/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More MK sets analysed
Similar house sets
- Detlef — Detlef @ Hi Ibiza / ANTS / 13/05/202379
- Joeski — Joeski - Stay The F*ck Safe Sessions79
- Mochakk — Mochakk Birthday Set 2021 - Pool Party Music79
- Lee Foss — Lee Foss Ibiza Voice Podcast - 19th August 201079
- Vintage Culture — Vintage Culture - Promised Land Remixes (Full Mix)79
- Masters at Work — MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix78
- Joeski — Joeski Live @ Stereobar 11/09/19 Part 180
- Andrea Oliva — Andrea Oliva Live at ANTS, Blue Parrot, BPM, Mexico - 8th January 201680
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research