MK — MK - Summer Mix 2013

    House · 1h 02m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    84/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 02m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, MK.

    In short

    MK - Summer Mix 2013 by MK scores 84/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (81/100).

    The DJ's strength lies in their ability to lock into a groove and maintain it with technical flawlessness, though more artistic risk-taking would elevate the set further.

    Key takeaways

    What worked

    • Technical precision in transitions
    • Consistent and infectious groove
    • Excellent track selection for the theme

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (32:48, 41:00, 50:00, 52:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use more aggressive EQ cuts in the mid-range during long overlaps to prevent frequency masking.
    • Experiment with 'teasing' upcoming vocal hooks earlier in the mix to build anticipation.
    • Incorporate brief moments of silence or atmospheric ambient bridges to reset the dancefloor's ears.
    • Use EQ more creatively during transitions to highlight specific elements of the incoming track.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 02:05Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 02:05

      Transparent transition where the incoming bassline replaces the outgoing one perfectly on phrase.

    • 05:42Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 05:42

      Smooth transition, though a slight buildup in the 500Hz-1kHz range is audible during the overlap.

    • 09:48Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 09:48

      High-pass filter used to thin out the outgoing track before a clean drop into the new groove.

    • 25:15Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 25:15

      Strategic disruption

    About this house set

    MK - Summer Mix 2013 is a house DJ set by MK, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 84/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ's strength lies in their ability to lock into a groove and maintain it with technical flawlessness, though more artistic risk-taking would elevate the set further.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 65 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1057.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ's strength lies in their ability to lock into a groove and maintain it with technical flawlessness, though more artistic risk-taking would elevate the set further.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured74
    Transition Qualitymeasured73
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI89
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI81
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI88

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured86
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI84
    Energy HandoffAI85
    Fatigue ControlAI82

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%81
    Unexpected MomentsAI77
    ContrastAI78
    Transition Varietymeasured90
    Selection RiskAI82
    FreshnessAI82
    Surprise ControlAI77

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%89
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI89
    ConfidenceAI90
    RestraintAI81
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    0:0062:00

    Transitions analysed (9)

    02:05

    64-bar EQ blend, low-end handover

    Transparent transition where the incoming bassline replaces the outgoing one perfectly on phrase.

    95
    05:42

    Mid-frequency layering with vocal overlap

    Smooth transition, though a slight buildup in the 500Hz-1kHz range is audible during the overlap.

    82
    09:48

    Filter sweep and drop swap

    High-pass filter used to thin out the outgoing track before a clean drop into the new groove.

    92
    11:20

    Perfect Blend

    100
    15:45

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    19:40

    Seamless Handover

    100
    21:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    25:15

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82
    29:45

    Seamless Vocal Swap

    100

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    88

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    89

    Harmonic compatibility

    90

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    25 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    259 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,727

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    65

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    113

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    256

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (32:48, 41:00, 50:00, 52:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What SOONOS heard

    • Technical precision in transitions
    • Consistent and infectious groove
    • Excellent track selection for the theme

    Timeline

    • 01:45Groove Lock
    • 05:50Vocal Peak
    • 08:15Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Use more aggressive EQ cuts in the mid-range during long overlaps to prevent frequency masking.
    • Experiment with 'teasing' upcoming vocal hooks earlier in the mix to build anticipation.
    • Incorporate brief moments of silence or atmospheric ambient bridges to reset the dancefloor's ears.
    • Use EQ more creatively during transitions to highlight specific elements of the incoming track.
    • Incorporate more varied percussion loops to keep the groove evolving.
    • Experiment with temporary BPM shifts or dramatic pauses to surprise the audience.
    • Focus on building a more complex emotional narrative beyond pure euphoria.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does MK's MK - Summer Mix 2013 get?
    MK - Summer Mix 2013 scores 84/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is MK - Summer Mix 2013?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More MK sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All MK analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.