MK — MK Live @ Creamfields 2019 - Mainstage 90min Set

    House · 1h 21m · Creamfields · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    82/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 21m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, MK.

    In short

    MK Live @ Creamfields 2019 - Mainstage 90min Set by MK scores 82/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (88/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (78/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (25:00, 29:00, 35:00, 43:00, 75:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use more dramatic EQ cuts to create 'breathing room' before major drops.
    • Experiment with layering non-vocal melodic elements to add textural variety.
    • Introduce brief rhythmic resets (silence or solo percussion) to heighten crowd anticipation.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 1:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 1:45

      Perfectly timed entry of the first main groove, maximizing the impact of the intro build.

    • 5:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 5:15

      Smooth transition between two piano-house tracks, maintaining the vocal energy throughout.

    • 12:34Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 12:34

      Perfectly executed transition maintaining the vocal energy and rhythmic drive.

    • 16:22Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 16:22

      Smooth transition that uses the vocal stems to bridge the two tracks effectively.

    • 20:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 20:15

      High-impact transition that lands perfectly on the downbeat, energizing the floor.

    • 24:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 24:12

      Perfectly timed entry of the next track's vocal over the outgoing groove.

    • 28:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 28:45

      High-energy transition using a high-pass filter to build tension before the drop.

    About this house set

    MK Live @ Creamfields 2019 - Mainstage 90min Set is a house DJ set by MK, running 1h 21m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 82/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 88/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 78/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 24 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 570.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 10 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured94
    Transition Qualitymeasured75
    Phrase Accuracymeasured91
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%86
    Narrative ArcAI87
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI85
    Flow ContinuityAI88
    PayoffAI91

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%84
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI83
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI86
    Energy HandoffAI86
    Fatigue ControlAI61

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%78
    Unexpected MomentsAI76
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured89
    Selection RiskAI81
    FreshnessAI62
    Surprise ControlAI76

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%88
    Selection QualityAI87
    Identity ConsistencyAI95
    IntentionalityAI89
    ConfidenceAI92
    RestraintAI75
    SignatureAI85

    Energy arc

    12:0081:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    1:45

    Drop-in after cinematic intro

    Perfectly timed entry of the first main groove, maximizing the impact of the intro build.

    92
    5:15

    32-bar EQ blend

    Smooth transition between two piano-house tracks, maintaining the vocal energy throughout.

    88
    12:34

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition maintaining the vocal energy and rhythmic drive.

    90
    16:22

    Vocal layering and mid-range swap

    Smooth transition that uses the vocal stems to bridge the two tracks effectively.

    85
    20:15

    Drop swap on the phrase

    High-impact transition that lands perfectly on the downbeat, energizing the floor.

    88
    24:12

    Long EQ blend with vocal layering

    Perfectly timed entry of the next track's vocal over the outgoing groove.

    92
    28:45

    Filter sweep and drop swap

    High-energy transition using a high-pass filter to build tension before the drop.

    85

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    87

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    85

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    10 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    232 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,858

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    66

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    36

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    168

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (25:00, 29:00, 35:00, 43:00, 75:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05Cinematic Opening
    • 4:30Tension Peak
    • 9:15Vocal Layering
    • 14:50Vocal Hook Impact
    • 18:10Energy Plateau
    • 21:45Peak Energy Moment
    • 25:30Vocal Peak
    • 30:10Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Use more dramatic EQ cuts to create 'breathing room' before major drops.
    • Experiment with layering non-vocal melodic elements to add textural variety.
    • Introduce brief rhythmic resets (silence or solo percussion) to heighten crowd anticipation.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does MK's MK Live @ Creamfields 2019 - Mainstage 90min Set get?
    MK Live @ Creamfields 2019 - Mainstage 90min Set scores 82/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is MK Live @ Creamfields 2019 - Mainstage 90min Set?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 21m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 88/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More MK sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All MK analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…