MK — MK - Get Lost Miami Set - March 2022

    House · 1h 25m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    80/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 25m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, MK.

    In short

    MK - Get Lost Miami Set - March 2022 by MK scores 80/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (76/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00, 36:00, 42:00, 62:30, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 3:15

      Seamless integration of the incoming percussive loop.

    • 7:30Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 7:30

      Smooth transition focusing on vocal continuity.

    • 12:34Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 12:34

      Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.

    • 16:22Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 16:22

      Excellent use of the incoming track's percussion to build energy before the drop.

    • 26:42Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 26:42

      Textbook tech-house transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural progression of the first track.

    About this house set

    MK - Get Lost Miami Set - March 2022 is a house DJ set by MK, running 1h 25m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 80/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 76/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 23 points, moving between 70 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 486.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%82
    Beat Alignmentmeasured77
    Transition Qualitymeasured67
    Phrase Accuracymeasured90
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI79
    Section AwarenessAI84
    Flow ContinuityAI89
    PayoffAI87

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%80
    Energy Curvemeasured78
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI84
    Fatigue ControlAI44

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%76
    Unexpected MomentsAI76
    ContrastAI77
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI80
    FreshnessAI42
    Surprise ControlAI76

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%89
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI88
    ConfidenceAI91
    RestraintAI82
    SignatureAI84

    Energy arc

    0:0073:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    3:15

    EQ blend with high-pass filter

    Seamless integration of the incoming percussive loop.

    88
    7:30

    Long blend with mid-range swap

    Smooth transition focusing on vocal continuity.

    82
    12:34

    32-bar EQ blend, low swap on phrase

    Smooth low handover on the downbeat, no flam, energy preserved.

    88
    16:22

    Stem layering with high-pass filter sweep

    Excellent use of the incoming track's percussion to build energy before the drop.

    92
    26:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Textbook tech-house transition. The incoming bassline is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural progression of the first track.

    94

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    87

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    24 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    222 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,075

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    99

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    47

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    310

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (29:00, 36:00, 42:00, 62:30, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Groove Establishment
    • 9:20Vocal Peak
    • 16:22Energy Peak
    • 20:45Groove Lock
    • 28:50Groove Lock Peak
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does MK's MK - Get Lost Miami Set - March 2022 get?
    MK - Get Lost Miami Set - March 2022 scores 80/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is MK - Get Lost Miami Set - March 2022?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 25m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 76/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More MK sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All MK analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.