Mita Gami — Mita Gami - The Block club 15\3\18

    Melodic House · 1h 09m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    76/100
    Level
    solid
    Duration
    1h 09m
    Genre
    Melodic House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mita Gami.

    In short

    Mita Gami - The Block club 15\3\18 by Mita Gami scores 76/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is TECHNIQUE (86/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (72/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (21:00, 25:00, 31:00, 46:00, 51:30, 57:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use longer filter sweeps to build more anticipation.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic signatures.
    • Experiment with brief energy resets to keep the floor alert.
    • Maintain the excellent technical precision shown in the blends.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:52Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 3:52

      Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove without any audible drift.

    • 8:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 8:15

      Smooth integration of the new track's percussion, keeping the energy stable.

    • 11:42Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 11:42

      Perfectly executed handover; the new kick takes over without any phase cancellation.

    • 15:15Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 15:15

      Smooth integration of new high-frequency elements before the main body of the track enters.

    • 20:30Measured (DSP)78/100Listen at 20:30

      A slightly abrupt change in the bass texture that momentarily disrupts the hypnotic flow.

    • 23:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 23:45

      Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove seamlessly.

    • 28:30Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 28:30

      Effective use of layering to build energy before the full switch.

    About this melodic house set

    Mita Gami - The Block club 15\3\18 is a melodic house DJ set by Mita Gami, running 1h 09m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 76/100 overall — solid.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is TECHNIQUE at 86/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 72/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 32 points, moving between 65 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 117.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured90
    Phrase Accuracymeasured87
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured83
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%79
    Narrative ArcAI81
    ProgressionAI79
    Tension & ReleaseAI75
    Section AwarenessAI79
    Flow ContinuityAI86
    PayoffAI78

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%76
    Energy Curvemeasured69
    PacingAI78
    MomentumAI87
    Peak ManagementAI73
    Energy HandoffAI81
    Fatigue ControlAI70

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%72
    Unexpected MomentsAI69
    ContrastAI70
    Transition Varietymeasured85
    Selection RiskAI71
    FreshnessAI62
    Surprise ControlAI69

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%80
    Selection QualityAI77
    Identity ConsistencyAI92
    IntentionalityAI80
    ConfidenceAI82
    RestraintAI75
    SignatureAI71

    Energy arc

    0:0068:32

    Transitions analysed (7)

    3:52

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove without any audible drift.

    90
    8:15

    Percussive layering and mid-range swap

    Smooth integration of the new track's percussion, keeping the energy stable.

    85
    11:42

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover; the new kick takes over without any phase cancellation.

    90
    15:15

    Percussive layering

    Smooth integration of new high-frequency elements before the main body of the track enters.

    85
    20:30

    Quick EQ swap on the drop

    A slightly abrupt change in the bass texture that momentarily disrupts the hypnotic flow.

    78
    23:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition, maintaining the groove seamlessly.

    92
    28:30

    Percussive layering and filter sweep

    Effective use of layering to build energy before the full switch.

    85

    Technical subscores

    83

    EQ balance

    90

    Beat alignment

    82

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    83

    Loudness control

    85

    Musical coherence

    82

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    37 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    4,095

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    36

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    0

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    182

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (21:00, 25:00, 31:00, 46:00, 51:30, 57:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 4:30Groove Lock
    • 9:45Tension Plateau
    • 20:30Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 25:40Vocal Hook Entry
    • 30:15Energy Plateau

    Coaching notes

    • Use longer filter sweeps to build more anticipation.
    • Incorporate tracks with more distinct melodic signatures.
    • Experiment with brief energy resets to keep the floor alert.
    • Maintain the excellent technical precision shown in the blends.
    • Use more dramatic EQ filtering during long blends to create movement.
    • Experiment with 'teasing' the next track's melody earlier in the transition.
    • Incorporate a 'reset' moment with a longer breakdown to clear the palate.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Mita Gami's Mita Gami - The Block club 15\3\18 get?
    Mita Gami - The Block club 15\3\18 scores 76/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Mita Gami - The Block club 15\3\18?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 09m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    TECHNIQUE is the strongest category at 86/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 72/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Mita Gami sets analysed

    Similar melodic house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Mita Gami analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…