Mita Gami — Mita Gami - Darker

    Melodic House · 59 min · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    81/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    59 min
    Genre
    Melodic House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mita Gami.

    In short

    Mita Gami - Darker by Mita Gami scores 81/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (87/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (78/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (20:00, 33:00, 35:00, 40:00, 45:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create tension breaks.
    • Introduce a signature melodic element to differentiate the set's identity.
    • Fine-tune mid-frequency EQ during long blends to avoid occasional muddiness.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:05Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 04:05

      Seamless transition where the new bassline takes over without any energy dip.

    • 08:08Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 08:08

      Smooth transition focusing on percussive textures; very well executed.

    • 11:32Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 11:32

      Excellent patience shown here, allowing the tracks to coexist and create a new texture.

    • 14:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 14:12

      Masterful handover; the transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the groove perfectly.

    • 18:24Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 18:24

      Smooth transition that introduces a new melodic texture without disrupting the rhythmic flow.

    • 22:45Measured (DSP)89/100Listen at 22:45

      Clean energy handoff that signals a shift into a more driving phase of the set.

    • 25:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:30

      Masterful control of the sub-frequencies; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    • 30:15Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 30:15

      Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while maintaining the percussive drive.

    About this melodic house set

    Mita Gami - Darker is a melodic house DJ set by Mita Gami, running 59 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 81/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 87/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 78/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 32 points, moving between 40 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 415.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%87
    Beat Alignmentmeasured82
    Transition Qualitymeasured87
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured86
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%84
    Narrative ArcAI88
    ProgressionAI84
    Tension & ReleaseAI80
    Section AwarenessAI84
    Flow ContinuityAI89
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured77
    PacingAI85
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI82
    Energy HandoffAI82
    Fatigue ControlAI71

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%78
    Unexpected MomentsAI75
    ContrastAI76
    Transition Varietymeasured89
    Selection RiskAI77
    FreshnessAI68
    Surprise ControlAI75

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%87
    Selection QualityAI84
    Identity ConsistencyAI94
    IntentionalityAI86
    ConfidenceAI87
    RestraintAI88
    SignatureAI82

    Energy arc

    00:0058:55

    Transitions analysed (8)

    04:05

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase

    Seamless transition where the new bassline takes over without any energy dip.

    92
    08:08

    Mid-range layering and high-pass filter exit

    Smooth transition focusing on percussive textures; very well executed.

    85
    11:32

    32-bar blend with gradual high-end introduction

    Excellent patience shown here, allowing the tracks to coexist and create a new texture.

    88
    14:12

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Masterful handover; the transition is almost imperceptible, maintaining the groove perfectly.

    92
    18:24

    Mid-range layering and filter fade

    Smooth transition that introduces a new melodic texture without disrupting the rhythmic flow.

    85
    22:45

    Percussive swap on the phrase

    Clean energy handoff that signals a shift into a more driving phase of the set.

    89
    25:30

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Masterful control of the sub-frequencies; the transition is almost imperceptible.

    92
    30:15

    Phased mid-range introduction

    Smooth introduction of new melodic elements while maintaining the percussive drive.

    88

    Technical subscores

    86

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    85

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    88

    Musical coherence

    86

    Harmonic compatibility

    89

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    157 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,519

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    36

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    23

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    282

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (20:00, 33:00, 35:00, 40:00, 45:00, 47:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 04:05Seamless Bass Handoff
    • 09:45Atmospheric Peak
    • 16:50Groove Lock Peak
    • 20:15Atmospheric Shift
    • 25:30Seamless Low-End Swap

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps to create tension breaks.
    • Introduce a signature melodic element to differentiate the set's identity.
    • Fine-tune mid-frequency EQ during long blends to avoid occasional muddiness.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Mita Gami's Mita Gami - Darker get?
    Mita Gami - Darker scores 81/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Mita Gami - Darker?
    The analysed recording runs 59 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 87/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Mita Gami sets analysed

    Similar melodic house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Mita Gami analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…