Mathew Jonson — Gottwood Mix #63 - Mathew Jonson [Live From Gottwood 2023]

    Indie House · 1h 47m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 47m
    Genre
    Indie House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mathew Jonson.

    In short

    Gottwood Mix #63 - Mathew Jonson [Live From Gottwood 2023] by Mathew Jonson scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 38:30, 48:00, 54:00, 60:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the exceptional level of rhythmic detail.
    • Explore even deeper melodic textures in the next segment.
    • Consider brief moments of silence to reset the listener's ear.
    • Continue to leverage the live modular setup for unique textural variations.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 5:45

      A masterfully executed introduction of new percussive layers that feels entirely organic.

    • 10:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 10:12

      Smooth transition between melodic themes, maintaining the hypnotic groove.

    • 13:15Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 13:15

      Incredibly smooth transition. The incoming percussive loop is introduced so subtly it feels like an arrangement change of the same track.

    • 17:40Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 17:40

      The DJ uses a high-pass filter on the outgoing track while slowly bringing in the full spectrum of the new groove. Phasing is perfect.

    • 22:10Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 22:10

      A high-energy moment where both tracks hit a phrase boundary simultaneously, doubling the rhythmic intensity without clutter.

    • 26:30Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 26:30

      Strategic disruption

    About this indie house set

    Gottwood Mix #63 - Mathew Jonson [Live From Gottwood 2023] is a indie house DJ set by Mathew Jonson, running 1h 47m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 43 points, moving between 20 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 894.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%81
    Beat Alignmentmeasured74
    Transition Qualitymeasured57
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI94
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI90
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI89

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%86
    Energy Curvemeasured86
    PacingAI95
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI92
    Fatigue ControlAI45

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%86
    Unexpected MomentsAI89
    ContrastAI88
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI93
    FreshnessAI44
    Surprise ControlAI89

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%96
    Selection QualityAI95
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI97
    ConfidenceAI97
    RestraintAI94
    SignatureAI98

    Energy arc

    0:00107:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    5:45

    Live stem layering and rhythmic addition

    A masterfully executed introduction of new percussive layers that feels entirely organic.

    95
    10:12

    Harmonic blend and bassline swap

    Smooth transition between melodic themes, maintaining the hypnotic groove.

    92
    13:15

    Long percussive blend with low-end swap

    Incredibly smooth transition. The incoming percussive loop is introduced so subtly it feels like an arrangement change of the same track.

    96
    17:40

    EQ-based layering and filter fade

    The DJ uses a high-pass filter on the outgoing track while slowly bringing in the full spectrum of the new groove. Phasing is perfect.

    92
    22:10

    Double-drop alignment

    A high-energy moment where both tracks hit a phrase boundary simultaneously, doubling the rhythmic intensity without clutter.

    94
    26:30

    minor

    strategic_disruption

    82
    30:15

    perfect

    100

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    97

    Beat alignment

    92

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    91

    Loudness control

    94

    Musical coherence

    93

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    25 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    220 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,430

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    194

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    36

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    460

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 38:30, 48:00, 54:00, 60:00, 64:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 4:30Groove Lock
    • 8:45Melodic Peak
    • 15:45Acid Modulation Peak
    • 19:20Percussive Density Shift

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the exceptional level of rhythmic detail.
    • Explore even deeper melodic textures in the next segment.
    • Consider brief moments of silence to reset the listener's ear.
    • Continue to leverage the live modular setup for unique textural variations.
    • Introduce a slightly more aggressive rhythmic break to contrast the rolling groove.
    • Experiment with spatial FX (delays/reverbs) to enhance the sense of depth in the mix.
    • Continue to leverage the live modular setup to create unique, non-replicable moments.
    • Consider a brief moment of near-silence or extreme filtering to create a massive tension reset.
    • Explore even more aggressive use of stereo imaging for the modular leads to enhance the immersive experience.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Mathew Jonson's Gottwood Mix #63 - Mathew Jonson [Live From Gottwood 2023] get?
    Gottwood Mix #63 - Mathew Jonson [Live From Gottwood 2023] scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Gottwood Mix #63 - Mathew Jonson [Live From Gottwood 2023]?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 47m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Mathew Jonson sets analysed

    Similar indie house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Mathew Jonson analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.