Mathew Jonson — Botanic Podcast - 032 - Mathew Jonson Live
Indie House · 1h 34m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Mathew Jonson.
In short
Botanic Podcast - 032 - Mathew Jonson Live by Mathew Jonson scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (96/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (81/100).
Mathew Jonson's live sets are a masterclass in how to use modular synthesis to create a living, breathing dancefloor narrative.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Exceptional rhythmic patience
- Flawless technical execution
- Strong artistic identity
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 4:30, 10:00, 12:00, 16:00, 22:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with more organic, non-synthetic sounds to create contrast.
- Use longer filter sweeps to build even more extreme tension.
- Incorporate a brief melodic motif to provide a memorable hook for the audience.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Seamless introduction of new percussive elements.
Smooth transition of synth textures via low-pass filtering.
Seamless introduction of a new rhythmic sequence via high-pass filter fade-in.
The acid line emerges organically from the percussion, feeling like a natural extension of the track.
About this indie house set
Botanic Podcast - 032 - Mathew Jonson Live is a indie house DJ set by Mathew Jonson, running 1h 34m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Mathew Jonson's live sets are a masterclass in how to use modular synthesis to create a living, breathing dancefloor narrative.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 96/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 81/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 38 points, moving between 40 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
4 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 572.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 24 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
Mathew Jonson's live sets are a masterclass in how to use modular synthesis to create a living, breathing dancefloor narrative.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%81
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%92
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%89
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%88
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%96
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (4)
Live stem introduction
Seamless introduction of new percussive elements.
Filter-based blend
Smooth transition of synth textures via low-pass filtering.
Live stem layering and filter sweep
Seamless introduction of a new rhythmic sequence via high-pass filter fade-in.
Live stem layering / Filter fade-in
The acid line emerges organically from the percussion, feeling like a natural extension of the track.
Technical subscores
92
EQ balance
98
Beat alignment
92
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
90
Loudness control
95
Musical coherence
94
Harmonic compatibility
95
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
24 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
198 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
5,630
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
164
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
23
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
382
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (0:00, 4:30, 10:00, 12:00, 16:00, 22:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Exceptional rhythmic patience
- Flawless technical execution
- Strong artistic identity
Timeline
- 4:30Rhythmic Shift
- 10:15Tension Peak
- 18:20Resonant Peak
- 21:45Groove Shift
Coaching notes
- Experiment with more organic, non-synthetic sounds to create contrast.
- Use longer filter sweeps to build even more extreme tension.
- Incorporate a brief melodic motif to provide a memorable hook for the audience.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Mathew Jonson's Botanic Podcast - 032 - Mathew Jonson Live get?
- Botanic Podcast - 032 - Mathew Jonson Live scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Botanic Podcast - 032 - Mathew Jonson Live?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 34m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 96/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 81/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Mathew Jonson sets analysed
Similar indie house sets
- Rhadoo — Rhadoo at Waking Life 202586
- Daniel Avery — Daniel Avery - Essential Mix (October 2025)86
- Rhadoo — Raresh, Petre Inspirescu, Rhadoo [a:rpia:r] @ Lima Perú 06-03-2026 Superclub86
- Trikk — ÂME DJ TRIKK FULL SET DGTL AMSTERDAM 202686
- Joy Orbison — JOY ORBISON BEN UFO SET86
- Onur Ozer — Onur Ozer Live @ Nu Echoes, Riccione - 26-06-201086
- HAAi — BBC Radio 1 Essential Mix86
- Daniel Avery — Daniel Avery Essential Mix (March 2018)86
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research