Masters at Work — MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix

    House · 2h 10m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    78/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    2h 10m
    Genre
    House

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Masters at Work.

    In short

    MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix by Masters at Work scores 78/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (77/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (36:00, 47:00, 56:00, 59:00, 63:30, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Use more aggressive high-mid EQ cuts on the outgoing track to make the incoming vocal pop more.
    • Experiment with 16-bar loops of percussive elements to create 'mini-mashups' between tracks.
    • Vary the transition lengths; while long blends are great, a few shorter 'drop' transitions can add excitement.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 4:18Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 4:18

      Very smooth transition into 'Nights Over Egypt'. The DJ waits for the phrase to resolve before fully committing to the new bassline.

    • 8:05Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 8:05

      Effective use of the incoming vocal to bridge the tracks. The levels are well-matched, avoiding any sudden volume spikes.

    • 13:22Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 13:22

      Masterful handover of the bassline. The DJ uses the full 32-bar phrase to introduce the new groove without the listener noticing the swap.

    • 17:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 17:45

      Smooth transition focusing on rhythmic elements. The syncopation between the two tracks creates a brief, interesting polyrhythm.

    • 22:15Measured (DSP)89/100Listen at 22:15

      Excellent timing on the vocal hook entry. The DJ aligns the phrases perfectly to maximize the impact of the incoming track's energy.

    About this house set

    MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix is a house DJ set by Masters at Work, running 2h 10m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 78/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 77/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 55 points, moving between 40 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 254.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 20 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured81
    Transition Qualitymeasured85
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured84
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured91
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%83
    Narrative ArcAI87
    ProgressionAI82
    Tension & ReleaseAI76
    Section AwarenessAI84
    Flow ContinuityAI90
    PayoffAI80

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured84
    PacingAI84
    MomentumAI87
    Peak ManagementAI78
    Energy HandoffAI81
    Fatigue ControlAI65

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%77
    Unexpected MomentsAI74
    ContrastAI73
    Transition Varietymeasured91
    Selection RiskAI79
    FreshnessAI61
    Surprise ControlAI74

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI92
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI88
    ConfidenceAI87
    RestraintAI85
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    0:00117:00

    Transitions analysed (6)

    4:18

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition into 'Nights Over Egypt'. The DJ waits for the phrase to resolve before fully committing to the new bassline.

    85
    8:05

    Vocal layering and mid-range blend

    Effective use of the incoming vocal to bridge the tracks. The levels are well-matched, avoiding any sudden volume spikes.

    82
    13:22

    Long EQ blend

    Masterful handover of the bassline. The DJ uses the full 32-bar phrase to introduce the new groove without the listener noticing the swap.

    92
    17:45

    Percussive layering

    Smooth transition focusing on rhythmic elements. The syncopation between the two tracks creates a brief, interesting polyrhythm.

    85
    22:15

    Vocal drop swap

    Excellent timing on the vocal hook entry. The DJ aligns the phrases perfectly to maximize the impact of the incoming track's energy.

    89
    25:30

    Perfect Blend

    100

    Technical subscores

    84

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    82

    Energy control

    91

    Tempo stability

    85

    Loudness control

    90

    Musical coherence

    88

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    20 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    183 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    7,795

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    8

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    16

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    344

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (36:00, 47:00, 56:00, 59:00, 63:30, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:05Intro Drop
    • 9:45Vocal Climax
    • 13:45Seamless Bass Swap
    • 22:20Vocal Hook Impact
    • 22:15Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Use more aggressive high-mid EQ cuts on the outgoing track to make the incoming vocal pop more.
    • Experiment with 16-bar loops of percussive elements to create 'mini-mashups' between tracks.
    • Vary the transition lengths; while long blends are great, a few shorter 'drop' transitions can add excitement.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Masters at Work's MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix get?
    MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix scores 78/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix?
    The analysed recording runs 2h 10m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 77/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Masters at Work sets analysed

    Similar house sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Masters at Work analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…