Lost Frequencies — me n ü LIVE @ Brooklyn Storehouse 10/24/25 Supporting Lost Frequencies

    Commercial EDM · 1h 32m · analysed 24 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    78/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 32m
    Genre
    Commercial EDM

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Lost Frequencies.

    In short

    me n ü LIVE @ Brooklyn Storehouse 10/24/25 Supporting Lost Frequencies by Lost Frequencies scores 78/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is STORYTELLING (85/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (76/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:30, 29:00, 36:30, 46:00, 54:00, 57:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Incorporate more live looping or layering to create unique textures.
    • Experiment with more dramatic energy resets to enhance the impact of the peaks.
    • Diversify the melodic palette to include more non-standard sounds.
    • Incorporate more live-looping or layering of percussive stems to add unique textures.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 5:42Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 5:42

      Perfectly transparent transition where the new vocal sits naturally over the existing groove.

    • 9:55Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 9:55

      Clean low-end handover that maintains momentum without any audible phase issues.

    • 12:25Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 12:25

      Very smooth transition that maintains the rhythmic pocket perfectly.

    • 17:40Measured (DSP)72/100Listen at 17:40

      Slightly abrupt change in the mid-range energy, though the beat remains locked.

    About this commercial edm set

    me n ü LIVE @ Brooklyn Storehouse 10/24/25 Supporting Lost Frequencies is a commercial edm DJ set by Lost Frequencies, running 1h 32m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 78/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 85/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 76/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 50 points, moving between 20 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 744.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 17 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%84
    Beat Alignmentmeasured85
    Transition Qualitymeasured72
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured92
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%85
    Narrative ArcAI86
    ProgressionAI83
    Tension & ReleaseAI82
    Section AwarenessAI85
    Flow ContinuityAI87
    PayoffAI85

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%81
    Energy Curvemeasured83
    PacingAI81
    MomentumAI88
    Peak ManagementAI83
    Energy HandoffAI82
    Fatigue ControlAI57

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%76
    Unexpected MomentsAI76
    ContrastAI79
    Transition Varietymeasured87
    Selection RiskAI72
    FreshnessAI58
    Surprise ControlAI76

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%83
    Selection QualityAI82
    Identity ConsistencyAI92
    IntentionalityAI83
    ConfidenceAI85
    RestraintAI75
    SignatureAI75

    Energy arc

    0:0091:35

    Transitions analysed (6)

    5:42

    Long EQ blend with high-pass filtering

    Perfectly transparent transition where the new vocal sits naturally over the existing groove.

    92
    9:55

    Bass swap on phrase boundary

    Clean low-end handover that maintains momentum without any audible phase issues.

    88
    12:25

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Very smooth transition that maintains the rhythmic pocket perfectly.

    88
    17:40

    Quick mid-frequency swap

    Slightly abrupt change in the mid-range energy, though the beat remains locked.

    72
    23:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    28:00

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82

    Technical subscores

    85

    EQ balance

    91

    Beat alignment

    86

    Energy control

    92

    Tempo stability

    86

    Loudness control

    86

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    86

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    17 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    222 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,478

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    81

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    13

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    181

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (24:30, 29:00, 36:30, 46:00, 54:00, 57:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 6:15Vocal Peak
    • 18:55Tension Peak
    • 21:15Energy Payoff
    • 17:40Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Incorporate more live looping or layering to create unique textures.
    • Experiment with more dramatic energy resets to enhance the impact of the peaks.
    • Diversify the melodic palette to include more non-standard sounds.
    • Incorporate more live-looping or layering of percussive stems to add unique textures.
    • Experiment with brief, unexpected genre-blending to add a 'surprise' element.
    • Maintain the excellent gain-staging observed in this segment.
    • Continue to explore the emotional range of melodic techno and progressive house.
    • Experiment with even more complex layering techniques during peak moments.
    • Maintain the high level of narrative coherence demonstrated in this closing segment.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Lost Frequencies's me n ü LIVE @ Brooklyn Storehouse 10/24/25 Supporting Lost Frequencies get?
    me n ü LIVE @ Brooklyn Storehouse 10/24/25 Supporting Lost Frequencies scores 78/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is me n ü LIVE @ Brooklyn Storehouse 10/24/25 Supporting Lost Frequencies?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 32m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 85/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 76/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    Similar commercial edm sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Lost Frequencies analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…