Jeremy Olander — Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-29

    Progressive · 1h 02m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    86/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 02m
    Genre
    Progressive

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Jeremy Olander.

    In short

    Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-29 by Jeremy Olander scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (95/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (86/100).

    The DJ treats the mix as a single evolving instrument rather than a collection of tracks.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 27:00, 31:00, 35:00, 41:00, 45:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Maintain the long-blend technique; it is your strongest technical asset.
    • Experiment with subtle vocal textures to add a human element to the deep atmosphere.
    • Ensure the mid-range EQ doesn't become too dense during the 3-track layering phases.
    • Continue to leverage long, harmonic blends as they are a clear strength.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:15Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 04:15

      Invisible transition. The basslines are perfectly phase-aligned, creating a seamless energy transfer.

    • 08:30Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 08:30

      Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements. The DJ uses the high-pass filter effectively to blend textures.

    • 11:15Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 11:15

      Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic state perfectly.

    • 18:00Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 18:00

      Beautifully executed harmonic blend that enriches the narrative.

    • 21:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 21:45

      Perfectly executed handover of the sub-bass frequencies, maintaining the groove without a hitch.

    • 26:30Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 26:30

      A beautiful transition where the incoming melody perfectly complements the outgoing rhythm.

    About this progressive set

    Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-29 is a progressive DJ set by Jeremy Olander, running 1h 02m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ treats the mix as a single evolving instrument rather than a collection of tracks.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 95/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 86/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 38 points, moving between 20 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1135.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 26 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ treats the mix as a single evolving instrument rather than a collection of tracks.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured73
    Transition Qualitymeasured78
    Phrase Accuracymeasured95
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured97
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%92
    Narrative ArcAI96
    ProgressionAI92
    Tension & ReleaseAI87
    Section AwarenessAI93
    Flow ContinuityAI96
    PayoffAI84

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%89
    Energy Curvemeasured89
    PacingAI94
    MomentumAI92
    Peak ManagementAI90
    Energy HandoffAI90
    Fatigue ControlAI74

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%86
    Unexpected MomentsAI84
    ContrastAI85
    Transition Varietymeasured95
    Selection RiskAI85
    FreshnessAI73
    Surprise ControlAI84

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%95
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI96
    ConfidenceAI95
    RestraintAI95
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    00:0061:50

    Transitions analysed (6)

    04:15

    64-bar harmonic blend with low-end crossover

    Invisible transition. The basslines are perfectly phase-aligned, creating a seamless energy transfer.

    96
    08:30

    EQ-based layering of percussive stems

    Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements. The DJ uses the high-pass filter effectively to blend textures.

    92
    11:15

    Extended EQ blend with low-end handover

    Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic state perfectly.

    96
    18:00

    Harmonic layering of melodic stems

    Beautifully executed harmonic blend that enriches the narrative.

    94
    21:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover of the sub-bass frequencies, maintaining the groove without a hitch.

    92
    26:30

    Harmonic layering and filter sweep

    A beautiful transition where the incoming melody perfectly complements the outgoing rhythm.

    95

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    97

    Beat alignment

    91

    Energy control

    97

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    95

    Musical coherence

    96

    Harmonic compatibility

    94

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    26 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    258 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,693

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    45

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    877

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    168

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (12:00, 27:00, 31:00, 35:00, 41:00, 45:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 04:15The Invisible Handover
    • 07:45Melodic Peak of Segment
    • 11:15Seamless Blend
    • 18:00Harmonic Peak
    • 24:15Narrative Shift
    • 28:50Tension Peak

    Coaching notes

    • Maintain the long-blend technique; it is your strongest technical asset.
    • Experiment with subtle vocal textures to add a human element to the deep atmosphere.
    • Ensure the mid-range EQ doesn't become too dense during the 3-track layering phases.
    • Continue to leverage long, harmonic blends as they are a clear strength.
    • Consider a brief rhythmic breakdown to reset the listener's ear before the next build.
    • Experiment with subtle vocal textures to add a human element to the electronic soundscape.
    • Maintain the long-blend philosophy; it is your strongest asset.
    • Explore even darker atmospheric textures to contrast the melodic peaks.
    • Consider a brief rhythmic 'reset' to heighten the impact of the final peak.
    • Continue to prioritize long, patient blends; they are the core of your professional sound.
    • Experiment with subtle field recordings or ambient textures during breakdowns to enhance the cinematic feel.
    • Maintain the current balance of dark energy and melodic resolution; it's a winning combination.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Jeremy Olander's Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-29 get?
    Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-29 scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Mau5trap presents... Jeremy Olander Guest Mix | 2016-07-29?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 02m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 95/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 86/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Jeremy Olander sets analysed

    Similar progressive sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Jeremy Olander analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.