What score does Jeremy Olander's John Digweed presents Transitions 666 with Jeremy Olander get?

John Digweed presents Transitions 666 with Jeremy Olander scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 83/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Jeremy Olander

Jeremy Olander — John Digweed presents Transitions 666 with Jeremy Olander

Progressive · 57 min · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

86/100

Level

festival ready

Duration

57 min

Genre

Progressive

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Jeremy Olander.

In short

John Digweed presents Transitions 666 with Jeremy Olander by Jeremy Olander scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (83/100).

The DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving composition rather than a series of tracks.

Key takeaways

What worked

Technical precision in long blends
Harmonic selection
Pacing and restraint

What weakened the set

Long static loops (4×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (21:00, 34:00, 38:00, 46:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

What to try next

Maintain the long-form blending style; it is your signature.
Experiment with subtle reverb washes on outgoing tracks to smooth transitions even further.
Consider a 'reset' moment with a beatless breakdown to refresh the listener's ears.
Continue to leverage long, evolving blends to maintain the hypnotic state.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

03:22Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 03:22
Invisible transition that maintains the hypnotic flow perfectly.
07:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 07:45
Beautifully aligned keys create a lush, evolving texture.
11:52Measured (DSP)96/100Listen at 11:52
A masterfully executed long blend where the new bassline emerges perfectly under the outgoing melody.
17:25Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 17:25
Smooth transition focusing on the mid-range percussion handover.

About this progressive set

John Digweed presents Transitions 666 with Jeremy Olander is a progressive DJ set by Jeremy Olander, running 57 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

The DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving composition rather than a series of tracks.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 83/100.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 24 points, moving between 20 and 85 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 280.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 14 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The DJ treats the mix as a single, evolving composition rather than a series of tracks.

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%91

Beat Alignmentmeasured89

Transition Qualitymeasured90

Phrase Accuracymeasured95

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured93

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%91

Narrative ArcAI95

ProgressionAI91

Tension & ReleaseAI87

Section AwarenessAI92

Flow ContinuityAI95

PayoffAI83

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%85

Energy Curvemeasured88

PacingAI93

MomentumAI91

Peak ManagementAI89

Energy HandoffAI89

Fatigue ControlAI41

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%83

Unexpected MomentsAI86

ContrastAI89

Transition Varietymeasured95

Selection RiskAI80

FreshnessAI36

Surprise ControlAI86

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%94

Selection QualityAI93

Identity ConsistencyAI98

IntentionalityAI94

ConfidenceAI94

RestraintAI95

SignatureAI91

Energy arc

00:0056:00