Indira Paganotto — Indira Paganotto Residence February : Maxximum Radio , Paris

    Hard Techno · 1h 01m · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    83/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    1h 01m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Indira Paganotto.

    In short

    Indira Paganotto Residence February : Maxximum Radio , Paris by Indira Paganotto scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (90/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (80/100).

    The DJ uses percussive layering not just to transition, but to evolve the groove's DNA, moving from straight techno to psy-influenced structures seamlessly.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 39:00, 41:00, 51:00, 55:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with longer, 64-bar blends to create more complex rhythmic textures.
    • Use occasional 'silent' breaks (1-2 beats) to emphasize the impact of the kick re-entry.
    • Integrate more atmospheric pads to enhance the dark, industrial mood.
    • Introduce more atmospheric elements to create contrast.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 3:05Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 3:05

      Perfectly timed bass handover; the energy remains constant without any phase cancellation.

    • 5:42Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 5:42

      High-pass filter used to clear space; slightly abrupt mid-range entry but fits the aggressive style.

    • 8:30Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 8:30

      Incoming track's percussion builds over the outgoing track, culminating in a clean drop swap.

    • 13:55Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 13:55

      Strategic disruption

    • 19:45Measured (DSP)64/100Listen at 19:45

      Intentional reset

    • 22:15Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 22:15

      Masterful integration of new percussive elements before the bass swap.

    • 26:30Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 26:30

      High-impact switch that re-energizes the groove perfectly.

    About this hard techno set

    Indira Paganotto Residence February : Maxximum Radio , Paris is a hard techno DJ set by Indira Paganotto, running 1h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    The DJ uses percussive layering not just to transition, but to evolve the groove's DNA, moving from straight techno to psy-influenced structures seamlessly.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 90/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 80/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 25 points, moving between 75 and 94 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 650.5 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 15 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The DJ uses percussive layering not just to transition, but to evolve the groove's DNA, moving from straight techno to psy-influenced structures seamlessly.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured88
    Transition Qualitymeasured60
    Phrase Accuracymeasured89
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured94
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%87
    Narrative ArcAI89
    ProgressionAI86
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI86
    Flow ContinuityAI91
    PayoffAI90

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI84
    MomentumAI93
    Peak ManagementAI85
    Energy HandoffAI89
    Fatigue ControlAI54

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%80
    Unexpected MomentsAI78
    ContrastAI78
    Transition Varietymeasured92
    Selection RiskAI86
    FreshnessAI54
    Surprise ControlAI78

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%90
    Selection QualityAI89
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI92
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI77
    SignatureAI91

    Energy arc

    0:0061:00

    Transitions analysed (9)

    3:05

    EQ-based low-end swap on phrase

    Perfectly timed bass handover; the energy remains constant without any phase cancellation.

    92
    5:42

    Filter-led transition with quick mid-swap

    High-pass filter used to clear space; slightly abrupt mid-range entry but fits the aggressive style.

    85
    8:30

    Percussive layering and drop swap

    Incoming track's percussion builds over the outgoing track, culminating in a clean drop swap.

    90
    10:45

    Perfect Blend

    100
    13:55

    Minor EQ Overlap

    strategic_disruption

    82
    17:12

    Seamless Handoff

    100
    19:45

    Noticeable Level Jump

    intentional_reset

    64
    22:15

    Long percussive blend with high-pass filtering

    Masterful integration of new percussive elements before the bass swap.

    94
    26:30

    Drop swap on the 32nd bar

    High-impact switch that re-energizes the groove perfectly.

    88

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    92

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    94

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    81

    Harmonic compatibility

    88

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    15 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    202 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,659

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    135

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    1

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    339

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:00, 39:00, 41:00, 51:00, 55:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 2:15Energy Peak Early
    • 5:30Tension Masterclass
    • 5:42Risky pressure or vibe dip
    • 19:45Risky pressure or vibe dip

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with longer, 64-bar blends to create more complex rhythmic textures.
    • Use occasional 'silent' breaks (1-2 beats) to emphasize the impact of the kick re-entry.
    • Integrate more atmospheric pads to enhance the dark, industrial mood.
    • Introduce more atmospheric elements to create contrast.
    • Experiment with dramatic filter sweeps during breakdowns.
    • Maintain the high level of technical precision shown here.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Indira Paganotto's Indira Paganotto Residence February : Maxximum Radio , Paris get?
    Indira Paganotto Residence February : Maxximum Radio , Paris scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Indira Paganotto Residence February : Maxximum Radio , Paris?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 01m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 90/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 80/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Indira Paganotto sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Indira Paganotto analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Loading…