Hadone — HADONE dj set @fuse 03.03.24
Hard Techno · 1h 43m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Hadone.
In short
HADONE dj set @fuse 03.03.24 by Hadone scores 86/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 19:00, 27:00, 31:00, 34:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Experiment with brief melodic motifs to provide a human element to the industrial drive.
- Consider a dramatic 'reset' moment to clear the sonic palette before a major transition.
- Utilize more extreme filter sweeps to create moments of tension and release within the loops.
- Introduce a brief melodic counterpoint to enhance the dark atmosphere.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Surgical transition where the new kick takes over perfectly on the phrase start.
High-energy handoff that increases the percussive drive significantly.
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the rolling energy without a dip.
Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements that build the energy floor.
Strategic disruption
About this hard techno set
HADONE dj set @fuse 03.03.24 is a hard techno DJ set by Hadone, running 1h 43m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 86/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 38 points, moving between 65 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 500.3 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 22 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%85
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%90
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%85
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%82
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%94
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Surgical transition where the new kick takes over perfectly on the phrase start.
Fast layering and high-pass filter release
High-energy handoff that increases the percussive drive significantly.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase
Perfectly executed transition that maintains the rolling energy without a dip.
Percussive layering with high-pass filter entry
Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements that build the energy floor.
Perfect Blend
Minor EQ Overlap
strategic_disruption
Technical subscores
88
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
93
Energy control
96
Tempo stability
89
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
83
Harmonic compatibility
88
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
22 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
201 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
6,146
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
74
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
124
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
480
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (13:00, 19:00, 27:00, 31:00, 34:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 3:20Atmospheric Peak
- 7:45Groove Lock
- 14:30Groove Lock Peak
- 20:45High-Frequency Energy Shift
- 27:45Rhythmic Lock
Coaching notes
- Experiment with brief melodic motifs to provide a human element to the industrial drive.
- Consider a dramatic 'reset' moment to clear the sonic palette before a major transition.
- Utilize more extreme filter sweeps to create moments of tension and release within the loops.
- Introduce a brief melodic counterpoint to enhance the dark atmosphere.
- Experiment with extreme high-pass filtering during builds to create more impact on the drop.
- Maintain the current layering speed; it is a core strength of this set.
- Experiment with wider stereo imaging on synth layers to create more space.
- Use subtle reverb automation on the master to create artificial 'room' during transitions.
- Consider a brief tempo drop (1-2 BPM) during a breakdown to reset the physical drive.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Hadone's HADONE dj set @fuse 03.03.24 get?
- HADONE dj set @fuse 03.03.24 scores 86/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is HADONE dj set @fuse 03.03.24?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 43m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Hadone sets analysed
Similar hard techno sets
- Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte - Awakenings Festival 202586
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Exhale Together Live Stream 202186
- Charlotte de Witte — Charlotte de Witte at KNTXT Sportpaleis (November 2019)86
- Sara Landry — SARA LANDRY (LIVE SET) @ DEF: THE BOILER86
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry @ Respira Festival 2026 (Santiago, Chile)86
- Kasia — Kasia Live at @Tommorowland for @Afterlife 202486
- Sara Landry — Sara Landry - Live @ By the Creek 202686
- Kobosil — Kobosil | Synoid 2020 | Revier Südost, Berlin86
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research