Hadone — Hadone at RAW x opaqe, Lisbon | Apr 2026

    Hard Techno · 1h 31m · analysed 23 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 31m
    Genre
    Hard Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Hadone.

    In short

    Hadone at RAW x opaqe, Lisbon | Apr 2026 by Hadone scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (94/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 46:00, 52:00, 68:00, 75:00, 80:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 2:45Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 2:45

      Perfectly executed transition where the industrial texture of the incoming track bleeds in over 32 bars.

    • 6:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 6:12

      High-energy moment where the DJ uses a filter to build tension before slamming the new track's kick.

    • 16:22Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 16:22

      Intentional reset

    • 28:05Measured (DSP)82/100Listen at 28:05

      Strategic disruption

    About this hard techno set

    Hadone at RAW x opaqe, Lisbon | Apr 2026 is a hard techno DJ set by Hadone, running 1h 31m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 94/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 30 points, moving between 70 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

    7 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 136.7 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 19 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%83
    Beat Alignmentmeasured83
    Transition Qualitymeasured65
    Phrase Accuracymeasured92
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured87
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured77

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%91
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI91
    Tension & ReleaseAI86
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI94
    PayoffAI92

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured81
    PacingAI90
    MomentumAI95
    Peak ManagementAI89
    Energy HandoffAI93
    Fatigue ControlAI52

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI82
    ContrastAI78
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI89
    FreshnessAI52
    Surprise ControlAI82

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%94
    Selection QualityAI93
    Identity ConsistencyAI98
    IntentionalityAI95
    ConfidenceAI96
    RestraintAI84
    SignatureAI93

    Energy arc

    0:0090:00

    Transitions analysed (7)

    2:45

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed transition where the industrial texture of the incoming track bleeds in over 32 bars.

    94
    6:12

    High-pass filter sweep into drop

    High-energy moment where the DJ uses a filter to build tension before slamming the new track's kick.

    92
    12:25

    Perfect Blend

    100
    16:22

    Minor EQ Overlap

    intentional_reset

    82
    20:15

    Elite Layering

    100
    24:12

    Perfect Blend

    100
    28:05

    Minor Level Jump

    strategic_disruption

    82

    Technical subscores

    87

    EQ balance

    93

    Beat alignment

    93

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    87

    Loudness control

    89

    Musical coherence

    81

    Harmonic compatibility

    87

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    19 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    40 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    5,453

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    194

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    45

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    438

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (9:00, 46:00, 52:00, 68:00, 75:00, 80:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 0:45Atmospheric Hook
    • 8:30Percussive Peak
    • 18:42Rhythmic Lock
    • 16:15Mid-Range Clutter
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Hadone's Hadone at RAW x opaqe, Lisbon | Apr 2026 get?
    Hadone at RAW x opaqe, Lisbon | Apr 2026 scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Hadone at RAW x opaqe, Lisbon | Apr 2026?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 31m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 94/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Hadone sets analysed

    Similar hard techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Hadone analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.