Ferry Corsten — Resonation Radio 294 [Wednesday, July 15, 2026]

    Trance · 60 min · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    83/100
    Level
    club ready
    Duration
    60 min
    Genre
    Trance

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Ferry Corsten.

    In short

    Resonation Radio 294 [Wednesday, July 15, 2026] by Ferry Corsten scores 83/100 in the SOONOS analysis (club ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (78/100).

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 18:00, 48:00, 52:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 12:34Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:34

      Perfectly executed handover, maintaining the sub-bass energy without clashing.

    • 17:22Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 17:22

      Exceptional musicality; the two tracks sound like a single composition during the overlap.

    • 25:12Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 25:12

      A textbook example of a transparent transition. The incoming track's atmosphere is introduced so subtly it feels like a single composition.

    About this trance set

    Resonation Radio 294 [Wednesday, July 15, 2026] is a trance DJ set by Ferry Corsten, running 60 min. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 83/100 overall — club ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 78/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 21 points, moving between 40 and 90 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

    6 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 764.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 23 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%85
    Beat Alignmentmeasured78
    Transition Qualitymeasured70
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured91
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured95
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured85

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI93
    ProgressionAI88
    Tension & ReleaseAI83
    Section AwarenessAI90
    Flow ContinuityAI92
    PayoffAI83

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%82
    Energy Curvemeasured88
    PacingAI88
    MomentumAI89
    Peak ManagementAI88
    Energy HandoffAI87
    Fatigue ControlAI29

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%78
    Unexpected MomentsAI80
    ContrastAI88
    Transition Varietymeasured94
    Selection RiskAI74
    FreshnessAI29
    Surprise ControlAI80

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%89
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI96
    IntentionalityAI90
    ConfidenceAI91
    RestraintAI83
    SignatureAI85

    Energy arc

    0:0059:57

    Transitions analysed (6)

    2:15

    Perfect Blend

    100
    5:15

    Seamless Handoff

    100
    8:40

    Minor EQ Overlap

    82
    12:34

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Perfectly executed handover, maintaining the sub-bass energy without clashing.

    92
    17:22

    Harmonic layering

    Exceptional musicality; the two tracks sound like a single composition during the overlap.

    95
    25:12

    Long EQ blend with phrase-perfect low-end swap

    A textbook example of a transparent transition. The incoming track's atmosphere is introduced so subtly it feels like a single composition.

    94

    Technical subscores

    91

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    88

    Energy control

    95

    Tempo stability

    90

    Loudness control

    91

    Musical coherence

    95

    Harmonic compatibility

    92

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    23 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    221 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    3,581

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    88

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    12

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    147

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (5×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (6:00, 18:00, 48:00, 52:00, 56:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 15:50Melodic Peak
    • 21:45Energy Plateau
    • 26:15Voiceover Integration
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Ferry Corsten's Resonation Radio 294 [Wednesday, July 15, 2026] get?
    Resonation Radio 294 [Wednesday, July 15, 2026] scores 83/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (club ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Resonation Radio 294 [Wednesday, July 15, 2026]?
    The analysed recording runs 60 min.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 78/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Ferry Corsten sets analysed

    Similar trance sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Ferry Corsten analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.