What score does Ferry Corsten's Resonation Radio 293 get?

Resonation Radio 293 scores 70/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Resonation Radio 293?

The analysed recording runs 1h 00m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

IDENTITY is the strongest category at 89/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 77/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Ferry Corsten

Ferry Corsten — Resonation Radio 293

Trance · 1h 00m · analysed 19 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

70/100

Level

solid

Duration

1h 00m

Genre

Trance

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Ferry Corsten.

In short

Resonation Radio 293 by Ferry Corsten scores 70/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (89/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (77/100).

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

Key takeaways

What weakened the set

Long static loops (2×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (48:00, 54:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

1:15Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 1:15
Perfectly executed handover from the intro atmosphere into the first groove.
5:45Measured (DSP)90/100Listen at 5:45
Smooth integration of the second track's percussion over the first track's breakdown.
10:12Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 10:12
Energetic switch that maintains momentum while introducing a more aggressive lead.
12:48Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 12:48
Perfectly executed handover. The incoming bassline takes over without any phase cancellation.
17:15Measured (DSP)89/100Listen at 17:15
Smooth transition using high-pass filtering to clear space for the new track's kick.
21:30Measured (DSP)91/100Listen at 21:30
High-impact transition that maintains peak energy. The tracks complement each other's frequency space.
25:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 25:12
Seamless transition, perfectly phrase-aligned with no audible drift.
28:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 28:45
Smooth handover between vocal sections, maintaining emotional momentum.

About this trance set

Resonation Radio 293 is a trance DJ set by Ferry Corsten, running 1h 00m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 70/100 overall — solid.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 89/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 77/100.

The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 14 points, moving between 20 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.

8 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1311.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 29 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%83

Beat Alignmentmeasured64

Transition Qualitymeasured82

Phrase Accuracymeasured93

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured89

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%87

Narrative ArcAI91

ProgressionAI86

Tension & ReleaseAI82

Section AwarenessAI87

Flow ContinuityAI90

PayoffAI85

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%82

Energy Curvemeasured88

PacingAI85

MomentumAI89

Peak ManagementAI88

Energy HandoffAI85

Fatigue ControlAI31

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%77

Unexpected MomentsAI77

ContrastAI82

Transition Varietymeasured92

Selection RiskAI80

FreshnessAI34

Surprise ControlAI77

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%89

Selection QualityAI88

Identity ConsistencyAI96

IntentionalityAI89

ConfidenceAI92

RestraintAI80

SignatureAI84

Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 84.

Energy arc

0:0060:00