Dimension — Sub Focus, Dimension, Culture Shock & 1991 | New York Livestream | WORSHIP x DNBNL x UKF
Drum AND Bass · 1h 24m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Dimension.
In short
Sub Focus, Dimension, Culture Shock & 1991 | New York Livestream | WORSHIP x DNBNL x UKF by Dimension scores 87/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (85/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (3×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:30, 64:30, 76:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Continue leveraging triple-track layering to maintain a unique sonic texture.
- Experiment with brief 'half-time' breakdowns to provide rhythmic variety.
- Ensure the high-frequency balance remains consistent when layering multiple synth-heavy tracks.
- Experiment with more complex layering of melodic stems to add depth.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly timed entry of the second track's kick, creating a massive energy surge.
Smooth integration of synth leads across 32 bars.
Intentional reset
A sharp, energetic transition that perfectly maintains the momentum of the set.
A masterful blend where the two tracks coexist harmoniously before a smooth handover.
About this drum and bass set
Sub Focus, Dimension, Culture Shock & 1991 | New York Livestream | WORSHIP x DNBNL x UKF is a drum and bass DJ set by Dimension, running 1h 24m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 87/100 overall — festival ready.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 85/100.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 38 points, moving between 40 and 97 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
8 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 700.2 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 25 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%86
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%91
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%89
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%85
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%92
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (8)
Double drop with low-end swap
Perfectly timed entry of the second track's kick, creating a massive energy surge.
Long melodic blend
Smooth integration of synth leads across 32 bars.
Perfect Blend
Double Drop
intentional_reset
Minor EQ Overlap
Surgical Cut
High-impact cut on the phrase
A sharp, energetic transition that perfectly maintains the momentum of the set.
Long EQ blend with subtle layering
A masterful blend where the two tracks coexist harmoniously before a smooth handover.
Technical subscores
88
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
93
Energy control
97
Tempo stability
92
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
88
Harmonic compatibility
90
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
25 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
199 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
5,014
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
29
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
28
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
183
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (3×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (31:30, 64:30, 76:30). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 2:15The First Impact
- 9:45Vocal Hook Integration
- 27:30Massive Buildup
Coaching notes
- Continue leveraging triple-track layering to maintain a unique sonic texture.
- Experiment with brief 'half-time' breakdowns to provide rhythmic variety.
- Ensure the high-frequency balance remains consistent when layering multiple synth-heavy tracks.
- Experiment with more complex layering of melodic stems to add depth.
- Use longer filter sweeps to build anticipation during transitions.
- Incorporate more varied sub-bass textures to keep the low-end interesting.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Dimension's Sub Focus, Dimension, Culture Shock & 1991 | New York Livestream | WORSHIP x DNBNL x UKF get?
- Sub Focus, Dimension, Culture Shock & 1991 | New York Livestream | WORSHIP x DNBNL x UKF scores 87/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Sub Focus, Dimension, Culture Shock & 1991 | New York Livestream | WORSHIP x DNBNL x UKF?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 24m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 85/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Dimension sets analysed
Similar drum and bass sets
- Sub Focus — SUB FOCUS @ EDC LAS VEGAS 2024 | circuitGROUNDS87
- Sub Focus — Sub Focus | Tomorrowland 2024 | Weekend 188
- Andy C — Andy C - AllNight 2014 Mix88
- Andy C — ANDY C - D&BTV x UKF On Air - One7Four Live Stream [FULL SET]88
- Andy C — Andy C Live At Ultra Festival Miami 201488
- Andy C — ANDY C live from KOKO - 30 Years of The End [Freestyle Set]88
- Andy C — Andy C - Radio 1 Residency Mix | 07.04.202288
- Andy C — Andy C - Radio 1 Residency Mix | 28.04.202288
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research