Dennis Ferrer — Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen)
House · 2h 01m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Dennis Ferrer.
In short
Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen) by Dennis Ferrer scores 76/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (82/100).
The DJ's restraint is their greatest strength, allowing the music to do the work rather than over-relying on technical tricks.
Key takeaways
What worked
- Exceptional groove continuity
- Professional EQ management
- Perfect style-to-context fit
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (22:00, 29:00, 36:00, 42:24, 92:00, 97:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
- Experiment with longer breakdowns to enhance tension and release.
- Use subtle effects like delay or reverb on vocal stabs for added depth.
- Introduce a brief melodic or atmospheric break to provide a 'palate cleanser' for the audience.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Invisible transition; the new bassline takes over without any phase cancellation.
Smooth integration of melodic elements; the energy handoff is perfectly timed.
Extremely smooth transition where the incoming bassline replaces the outgoing one almost imperceptibly.
Clean integration of new melodic elements over the existing groove.
Seamless transition that maintains the rhythmic drive perfectly.
About this house set
Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen) is a house DJ set by Dennis Ferrer, running 2h 01m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 76/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
The DJ's restraint is their greatest strength, allowing the music to do the work rather than over-relying on technical tricks.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 82/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 38 points, moving between 72 and 95 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.
5 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 194.8 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The DJ's restraint is their greatest strength, allowing the music to do the work rather than over-relying on technical tricks.
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%82
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%89
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%85
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%82
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%93
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 86.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (5)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap on phrase
Invisible transition; the new bassline takes over without any phase cancellation.
Mid-range layering and filter fade
Smooth integration of melodic elements; the energy handoff is perfectly timed.
Long EQ blend with gradual low-end swap
Extremely smooth transition where the incoming bassline replaces the outgoing one almost imperceptibly.
Mid-range layering and filter fade
Clean integration of new melodic elements over the existing groove.
Long EQ blend, low-end swap on phrase
Seamless transition that maintains the rhythmic drive perfectly.
Technical subscores
88
EQ balance
92
Beat alignment
88
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
87
Loudness control
91
Musical coherence
86
Harmonic compatibility
88
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
28 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
89 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
7,228
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
84
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
227
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
540
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (6×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (22:00, 29:00, 36:00, 42:24, 92:00, 97:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What SOONOS heard
- Exceptional groove continuity
- Professional EQ management
- Perfect style-to-context fit
Timeline
- 15:10Groove Lock
- 22:30Energy Plateau
- 28:45Groove Lock-In
Coaching notes
- Introduce more melodic elements to create emotional peaks.
- Experiment with longer breakdowns to enhance tension and release.
- Use subtle effects like delay or reverb on vocal stabs for added depth.
- Introduce a brief melodic or atmospheric break to provide a 'palate cleanser' for the audience.
- Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts during transitions to create more rhythmic 'pop'.
- Use a touch more delay or reverb on vocal loops to increase the sense of space in the outdoor setting.
- Continue to leverage long, subtle blends to maintain the hypnotic quality of the set.
- Consider introducing a brief rhythmic 'reset' to add more dynamic contrast.
- Experiment with layering more complex melodic stems to further distinguish the artistic signature.
- Maintain the high level of energy and vocal integration.
- Refine the final transition to ensure a smoother volume taper.
- Experiment with more dramatic filter sweeps during builds.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Dennis Ferrer's Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen) get?
- Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen) scores 76/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is Dennis Ferrer - BPM Festival 2014 (Mamitas, Playa Del Carmen)?
- The analysed recording runs 2h 01m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 82/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Dennis Ferrer sets analysed
Similar house sets
- wAFF — NATURECAST 004: Italo Bros76
- Mochakk — Mochakk @ Moving - D-EDGE (19/01/23)77
- Vintage Culture — Vintage Culture Live at Amazon Club, Chapeco SC (5hour Set P 1)77
- wAFF — NATURECAST 003: Lorenzo De Blanck75
- wAFF — NATURECAST 001: Nathan Alzon75
- Masters at Work — MAW / Masters At Work Records Mixed by Keith Harmer 2 Hour Mix78
- Joeski — Joeski's Stay The F*ck Home Sessions78
- wAFF — NATURECAST 006: FiRZA74
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research