Call Super — RA.435
Experimental Techno · 1h 30m · analysed 22 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com
Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Call Super.
In short
RA.435 by Call Super scores 74/100 in the SOONOS analysis (solid). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (93/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
Key takeaways
What weakened the set
- Long static loops (5×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (20:00, 34:00, 38:45, 67:00, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
What to try next
- Introduce subtle melodic elements to provide emotional contrast.
- Experiment with brief rhythmic resets to heighten the impact of the return to the groove.
- Maintain the exceptional focus on long-form, patient mixing.
- Continue to explore the use of subtle atmospheric layers to add narrative depth.
Timestamped insights
Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.
Perfectly executed handover; the transition is almost imperceptible.
Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements to maintain momentum.
A textbook hypnotic techno transition. The tracks overlap for over a minute, creating a third rhythmic space.
Smooth transition using high-pass filters to introduce the new track's top-end before swapping the bass.
About this experimental techno set
RA.435 is a experimental techno DJ set by Call Super, running 1h 30m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 74/100 overall — solid.
The engine files this performance as “Promising”.
How the score breaks down
SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 93/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.
The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.
Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.
Energy and structure
The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 20 and 88 on the SOONOS energy scale — a wide dynamic range across the set.
6 transitions were detected and scored individually.
Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 622.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 28 ms.
How this score is built
Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.
Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.
Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.
On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.
Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.
Full SOONOS analysis
The 8 dimensions
Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.
Score breakdown
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
25%83
TECHNIQUE
How well did you execute?
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
25%89
STORYTELLING
Did the mix go somewhere?
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
20%84
ENERGY
Did you control the room?
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
15%82
SURPRISE
Did you remain unpredictable?
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
15%93
IDENTITY
Did the mix sound like you?
Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 86.
Energy arc
Transitions analysed (6)
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
Perfectly executed handover; the transition is almost imperceptible.
Percussive layering
Smooth introduction of new rhythmic elements to maintain momentum.
Long EQ blend with low-end swap
A textbook hypnotic techno transition. The tracks overlap for over a minute, creating a third rhythmic space.
Filter-assisted blend
Smooth transition using high-pass filters to introduce the new track's top-end before swapping the bass.
Perfect Blend
Invisible Handoff
Technical subscores
89
EQ balance
94
Beat alignment
89
Energy control
94
Tempo stability
88
Loudness control
90
Musical coherence
87
Harmonic compatibility
90
Transition cleanliness
Measured (DSP)
28 ms
Beat-grid drift (median)
Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.
219 ms
Drift p95
Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.
5,357
Boundaries detected
Points where the audio changes track or section.
24
Hard cuts / h
Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.
53
Clipping events
Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.
399
Level jumps
Sudden volume steps between tracks.
Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.
Recurring patterns
Long static loops (5×)
Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (20:00, 34:00, 38:45, 67:00, 71:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Timeline
- 00:45Atmospheric Hook
- 05:30Groove Lock
- 10:15Energy Plateau
- 12:15The Perfect Blend
- 16:45Sub-Bass Peak
Coaching notes
- Introduce subtle melodic elements to provide emotional contrast.
- Experiment with brief rhythmic resets to heighten the impact of the return to the groove.
- Maintain the exceptional focus on long-form, patient mixing.
- Continue to explore the use of subtle atmospheric layers to add narrative depth.
- Experiment with very brief, sharp EQ cuts to create rhythmic 'gasps' in the groove.
- Maintain the current level of restraint; it is your most professional trait.
Curious how your own set scores?
Methodology and limitations
This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.
Read the full SOONOS methodology →Questions about this analysis
- What score does Call Super's RA.435 get?
- RA.435 scores 74/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (solid), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
- How long is RA.435?
- The analysed recording runs 1h 30m.
- Which part of the mix scores best?
- IDENTITY is the strongest category at 93/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
- How is this score calculated?
- SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.
More Call Super sets analysed
Similar experimental techno sets
- Speedy J — Speedy J @ Awakenings - Westergasfabriek 0810201074
- Objekt — Lokales Maximum objekt klein a / friggi / 14.03.02676
- Nina Kraviz — "hot steel" vol. 2 from Cavo Paradiso77
- Objekt — Hannie Phi @ objekt klein a - 25 Dec 202377
- Objekt — Sinamin Prime Time x Lokales Maximum // objekt klein a77
- Objekt — ROB/NSON at Objekt Klein A #Jahresrückblick 01.01.202078
- Objekt — objekt klein a XMAS Kalender Tür #23: Lysander - Πάμε Λίγο78
- Nina Kraviz — @ amnesia 17 august 202578
Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.
Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.
Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research