Bart Skils — Bart_Skils_@_Magdalena_Berlin_[22-02-2014]

    Peak Techno · 1h 55m · analysed 21 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

    Overall score
    85/100
    Level
    festival ready
    Duration
    1h 55m
    Genre
    Peak Techno

    Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Bart Skils.

    In short

    Bart_Skils_@_Magdalena_Berlin_[22-02-2014] by Bart Skils scores 85/100 in the SOONOS analysis (festival ready). The strongest dimension is IDENTITY (92/100) and the weakest is SURPRISE (82/100).

    Bart Skils treats the mix as a single, evolving machine, where every transition is a gear shift in a high-performance engine.

    Key takeaways

    What weakened the set

    • Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 20:00, 27:30, 33:00, 35:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    What to try next

    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts to create sharper energy shifts.
    • Introduce a third deck for subtle atmospheric layering to enhance the 'hypnotic' feel.
    • Monitor mid-range congestion during long overlaps to maintain clarity.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to create tension.

    Timestamped insights

    Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

    • 04:48Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 04:48

      Masterful handover. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like an arrangement change.

    • 09:12Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 09:12

      Excellent use of phrasing. The vocal loop enters exactly on the 32-bar mark, elevating the energy.

    • 13:45Measured (DSP)95/100Listen at 13:45

      A textbook Bart Skils blend. The transition is so smooth it's hard to pinpoint the exact swap point.

    • 18:20Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 18:20

      Effective use of filtering to clear the space for a more aggressive synth lead.

    • 25:12Measured (DSP)94/100Listen at 25:12

      Flawless transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    About this peak techno set

    Bart_Skils_@_Magdalena_Berlin_[22-02-2014] is a peak techno DJ set by Bart Skils, running 1h 55m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 85/100 overall — festival ready.

    The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

    Bart Skils treats the mix as a single, evolving machine, where every transition is a gear shift in a high-performance engine.

    How the score breaks down

    SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is IDENTITY at 92/100; the weakest is SURPRISE at 82/100.

    Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

    Energy and structure

    The energy curve was sampled at 44 points, moving between 75 and 92 on the SOONOS energy scale — a narrow dynamic range across the set.

    5 transitions were detected and scored individually.

    Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 92.4 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 13 ms.

    How this score is built

    Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

    Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

    Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

    Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

    Listen to the original set

    Full SOONOS analysis

    0

    Bart Skils treats the mix as a single, evolving machine, where every transition is a gear shift in a high-performance engine.

    The 8 dimensions

    Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

    Score breakdown

    TECHNIQUE

    How well did you execute?

    25%86
    Beat Alignmentmeasured90
    Transition Qualitymeasured67
    Phrase Accuracymeasured93
    EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured90
    Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96
    Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

    STORYTELLING

    Did the mix go somewhere?

    25%89
    Narrative ArcAI92
    ProgressionAI89
    Tension & ReleaseAI84
    Section AwarenessAI89
    Flow ContinuityAI95
    PayoffAI85

    ENERGY

    Did you control the room?

    20%85
    Energy Curvemeasured79
    PacingAI92
    MomentumAI94
    Peak ManagementAI86
    Energy HandoffAI88
    Fatigue ControlAI63

    SURPRISE

    Did you remain unpredictable?

    15%82
    Unexpected MomentsAI81
    ContrastAI81
    Transition Varietymeasured93
    Selection RiskAI82
    FreshnessAI61
    Surprise ControlAI81

    IDENTITY

    Did the mix sound like you?

    15%92
    Selection QualityAI88
    Identity ConsistencyAI97
    IntentionalityAI93
    ConfidenceAI94
    RestraintAI92
    SignatureAI89

    Energy arc

    12:00115:00

    Transitions analysed (5)

    04:48

    Long EQ blend with low-end swap

    Masterful handover. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like an arrangement change.

    95
    09:12

    Layered percussion blend

    Excellent use of phrasing. The vocal loop enters exactly on the 32-bar mark, elevating the energy.

    92
    13:45

    Extended percussive layering with low-end swap

    A textbook Bart Skils blend. The transition is so smooth it's hard to pinpoint the exact swap point.

    95
    18:20

    High-pass filter transition into a new groove

    Effective use of filtering to clear the space for a more aggressive synth lead.

    92
    25:12

    64-bar EQ blend, low-end swap on phrase

    Flawless transition. The incoming track's percussion is introduced so subtly it feels like a natural evolution of the first track.

    94

    Technical subscores

    90

    EQ balance

    95

    Beat alignment

    89

    Energy control

    96

    Tempo stability

    89

    Loudness control

    92

    Musical coherence

    87

    Harmonic compatibility

    93

    Transition cleanliness

    Measured (DSP)

    13 ms

    Beat-grid drift (median)

    Typical gap between the two tracks' beats while they play together. Lower is tighter.

    33 ms

    Drift p95

    Worst-case drift: 95% of the set stays tighter than this value.

    6,895

    Boundaries detected

    Points where the audio changes track or section.

    131

    Hard cuts / h

    Abrupt track changes per hour, with no blend between the two records.

    19

    Clipping events

    Moments where the recording hits the ceiling and distorts.

    475

    Level jumps

    Sudden volume steps between tracks.

    Measurement confidence 100% · analysed on the full audio.

    Recurring patterns

    • Long static loops (6×)

      Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (14:00, 20:00, 27:30, 33:00, 35:00, 40:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.

    Timeline

    • 15:10Groove Lock
    • 20:45Energy Plateau
    • 25:12Seamless Handoff
    • 29:30Filter Tension

    Coaching notes

    • Experiment with slightly more aggressive EQ cuts to create sharper energy shifts.
    • Introduce a third deck for subtle atmospheric layering to enhance the 'hypnotic' feel.
    • Monitor mid-range congestion during long overlaps to maintain clarity.
    • Use more dramatic filter sweeps to create tension.
    • Introduce a subtle melodic element to break the percussive dominance.
    • Experiment with brief silences or 'cuts' to surprise the audience.
    • Maintain the current level of technical precision.
    Listen on SoundCloud

    Curious how your own set scores?

    Methodology and limitations

    This report is produced automatically from the published recording. It measures what is present in the audio file: a bad source encoding, a partial upload or a heavily processed broadcast version can change the measured values. Nothing here reflects the room, the crowd or the night itself.

    Read the full SOONOS methodology →

    Questions about this analysis

    What score does Bart Skils's Bart_Skils_@_Magdalena_Berlin_[22-02-2014] get?
    Bart_Skils_@_Magdalena_Berlin_[22-02-2014] scores 85/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (festival ready), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.
    How long is Bart_Skils_@_Magdalena_Berlin_[22-02-2014]?
    The analysed recording runs 1h 55m.
    Which part of the mix scores best?
    IDENTITY is the strongest category at 92/100, while SURPRISE is the lowest at 82/100.
    How is this score calculated?
    SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

    More Bart Skils sets analysed

    Similar peak techno sets

    Live Club Simulation

    Test how a set like this one would land in a club, a beach club or a festival.

    Analyze my mix

    Get the same breakdown on your own set: transitions, energy arc and measured execution.

    Guides: How SOONOS works · DJ guides and research

    All Bart Skils analyses

    Bring your music in.

    Sign in to upload your mix.

    Your analysis is saved in your SOONOS account.