What score does Axwell's Axwell @ Electric Zoo (Live Set) get?

Axwell @ Electric Zoo (Live Set) scores 60/100 in the SOONOS Mix Database (developing), based on audio measurement plus multi-agent listening.

How long is Axwell @ Electric Zoo (Live Set)?

The analysed recording runs 1h 29m.

Which part of the mix scores best?

STORYTELLING is the strongest category at 92/100, while TECHNIQUE is the lowest at 83/100.

How is this score calculated?

SOONOS measures the audio with a DSP pass (beat grid, loudness, tempo, energy) and runs a multi-agent listening pass on top. Measured axes always override the listening layer, so an execution issue heard in the file caps the final score.

Axwell

Axwell — Axwell @ Electric Zoo (Live Set)

Commercial EDM · 1h 29m · analysed 20 Aug 2026 · source: soundcloud.com

Overall score

60/100

Level

developing

Duration

1h 29m

Genre

Commercial EDM

Public mix analysis — no affiliation or endorsement. This report measures a publicly available recording hosted on soundcloud.com. The scores are produced by SOONOS and do not imply any partnership with, or approval by, Axwell.

In short

Axwell @ Electric Zoo (Live Set) by Axwell scores 60/100 in the SOONOS analysis (developing). The strongest dimension is STORYTELLING (92/100) and the weakest is TECHNIQUE (83/100).

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

Key takeaways

What weakened the set

Repeated volume jumps (2×) — Gain-staging mismatches break perceived continuity and force the crowd to readjust. Detected 2× (7:45, 20:32).
Long static loops (6×) — Sections sitting on the same loop without layering, EQ moves or tension shifts (8:00, 33:00, 39:00, 44:00, 49:00, 54:00). Long loops kill dancefloor momentum.
Beat alignment needs work — typical drift of 30 ms — Measured median beat-grid drift is 30 ms across the transitions. Reference: pro ≤ 25 ms, needs work 30-42 ms, must be reworked > 42 ms. Above ~30 ms the kick flams and dancers feel the blend slipping.

What to try next

Experiment with longer, more atmospheric bridges to further heighten the impact of the drops.
Incorporate more call-and-response elements to deepen the connection with the audience.
Explore deeper, more melancholic textures in the breakdowns to add narrative complexity.

Timestamped insights

Each moment below is tagged with how it was produced: “measured” comes from the DSP pass on the audio, “listening” comes from the multi-agent listening pass.

0:45Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 0:45
Perfectly timed entry that capitalizes on the intro's momentum.
4:20Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 4:20
Smooth transition with effective low-end management.
7:45Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 7:45
Harmonically compatible blend that enriches the sonic texture.
12:18Measured (DSP)92/100Listen at 12:18
Perfectly timed energy hand-off that keeps the vocal momentum alive.
16:45Measured (DSP)88/100Listen at 16:45
Smooth transition between two melodic themes, maintaining harmonic integrity.
20:32Measured (DSP)85/100Listen at 20:32
Aggressive transition that works for the energy level but feels slightly abrupt.
22:34Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 22:34
Strategic disruption
30:15Measured (DSP)100/100Listen at 30:15
Intentional reset

About this commercial edm set

Axwell @ Electric Zoo (Live Set) is a commercial edm DJ set by Axwell, running 1h 29m. It was measured by the SOONOS multi-agent engine and scores 60/100 overall — developing.

The engine files this performance as “Promising”.

How the score breaks down

SOONOS scores this set across 5 weighted categories. The strongest is STORYTELLING at 92/100; the weakest is TECHNIQUE at 83/100.

The final score is capped by measured beatmatching: the DSP layer overrides the listening layer whenever it measures an execution issue directly in the audio.

Analysis coverage for this file is 100% — the share of the set the engine could measure with full confidence.

Energy and structure

The energy curve was sampled at 31 points, moving between 70 and 98 on the SOONOS energy scale — a moderate dynamic range across the set.

9 transitions were detected and scored individually.

Beat-grid measurement (DSP) reports 1042.0 grid breaks per hour, with a median beat offset of 30 ms.

How this score is built

Measured layer (DSP): the audio file is analysed directly — beat grid, tempo stability, loudness and energy. These values are measurements, not opinions.

Listening layer: a multi-agent pass reads musical intent — programming, storytelling, coherence and crowd effect. This layer interprets, it does not measure.

Fusion and ceilings: the two layers are merged, and the measured layer always wins on execution. When the DSP hears an execution problem, it caps the final score even if the listening layer is positive.

On this set, the ceiling applied is measured beatmatching.

Measured coverage for this file is 100% of the set.

Listen to the original set

Full SOONOS analysis

The 8 dimensions

Not available — the 8-dimension profile was not measured for this set.

Score breakdown

TECHNIQUE

How well did you execute?

25%83

Beat Alignmentmeasured60

Transition Qualitymeasured83

Phrase Accuracymeasured94

EQ & Frequency Control (estimated)measured85

Tempo Stability (estimated)measured96

Technical Cleanlinessmeasured80

STORYTELLING

Did the mix go somewhere?

25%92

Narrative ArcAI92

ProgressionAI90

Tension & ReleaseAI94

Section AwarenessAI92

Flow ContinuityAI90

PayoffAI97

ENERGY

Did you control the room?

20%90

Energy Curvemeasured92

PacingAI89

MomentumAI96

Peak ManagementAI94

Energy HandoffAI92

Fatigue ControlAI66

SURPRISE

Did you remain unpredictable?

15%86

Unexpected MomentsAI84

ContrastAI86

Transition Varietymeasured93

Selection RiskAI90

FreshnessAI68

Surprise ControlAI84

IDENTITY

Did the mix sound like you?

15%92

Selection QualityAI90

Identity ConsistencyAI97

IntentionalityAI94

ConfidenceAI96

RestraintAI80

SignatureAI91

Final score capped by measured beatmatching — the weighted average before the cap was 88.

Energy arc

0:0066:00